|
User Reviews
Send this to a friend
|
| Pentax DA 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED Lens for Pentax and Samsung Digital SLR Cameras |
| |
 |
| Manufacturer: Pentax |
| Customer Rating: |
|
| List Price: $429.95 |
| Sale Price: Too low to display |
| Availibility: Usually ships in 24 hours |
 Free Shipping Available |
| Buy Now |
|
| |
Product Description |
| The versatile Pentax DA 55-300mm zoom lens offers a focal length equivalent of 82.5 to 450mm in the 35mm format, making it ideal for moderate to long sports and wildlife shots. The lens is outfitted with multiple ED glass elements, which are designed to minimize chromatic aberration and makes images look crisper and sharper than ever before. The Pentax Super Protective coating, meanwhile, protects the exposed lens elements against dirt and contamination. Other features include a focusing ring that permits easy manual focusing, a 4.6-foot close focusing distance, and a 58mm filter diameter. Specially adapted for high-quality Pentax and Samsung digital SLR cameras, the lens carries a one-year warranty. Specifications
- Focal length: 55-300mm
- Maximum aperture: f/4 to 5.8
- Minimum aperture: f/22 to 32
- Lens construction: 12 elements in 8 groups
- Angle of view: 29 to 5.4 degrees (when used with Pentax digital SLR camera body)
- Number of diaphragm blades: 6
- Minimum focusing distance: 4.6 feet
- Maximum magnification: 0.28x
- Filter diameter: 58mm
- Diaphragm control: Fully automatic
- Hood: PH-RBG 58mm
- Objective cap: O-LC58
- Case: S80-160
- Corresponding AF mounts: Pentax and Samsung
- Dimensions: 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.4 inches long
- Weight: 15.5 ounces
- Warranty: 1 year
|
|
Product Details |
- Extreme telephoto range zoom lens
- PENTAX SP coating protects the exposed lens elements
- ED elements compensate for chromatic aberration
- Developed specifically for PENTAX digital SLRs
- Focal length equivalent to 82.5mm to 450mm in the 35mm format
|
Video Reviews |
 No video reviews found for this product.
|
Customer Reviews |
 Excellent value |
| Review Date: June 3, 2009 |
| Reviewer: J. Jones, Rogers, AR |
When I replaced my K100d with the K20d I soon realized I needed better glass than my Tamron 18-250. The Tammy is a great do-it-all lens but just isn't as sharp as I would like. And the longer the focal length, the softer it gets. Stopping down helps but that makes an already slow lens even slower.
I decided early on that I had to have the Pentax 16-45mm f/4 and the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8. Great lenses and what I need most of the time but sometimes a guy (or gal or smizmar) needs more reach. After reading lots of reviews, I decided I would be happy with the Pentax 55-300mm f/4-5.8.
Turns out it's even better than I thought it would be. Comparing shots of a test chart, I can see that it's not quite as sharp as, say, my 50mm f/1.4 but it's closer than I thought it would be. Pictures of the real world look plenty sharp with good color and contrast. Even wide open at 300mm. I might stop down when shooting the moon on a tripod but most of the time I leave it wide open.
Speaking of wide open, f4-5.8 doesn't sound very fast but I've found that it stays at f/4 until somewhere past 107mm and f/4.5 until past 190mm. Compared to my 18-250 it's almost always a full stop faster.
Some people complain about autofocus problems. I've had no problems with it. In EXTREMELY low light conditions I've seen it take as long as 1.5 seconds to lock on. If this is a problem, stop bitching and find a really expensive lens to suit your needs.
Which brings me to my conclusion. If this lens cost me $700 I would be way more critical. At $305.93 and free shipping from Amazon, I consider this lens to be a steal. But that's just my arrogant opinion. |
Extraordinary value, and a first-rate lens
|
| Review Date: February 25, 2009 |
| Reviewer: Tabulrasa, Waldport, OR |
I share the prejudice expressed by several people who write reviews on this site, namely that the best fixed focal length (a.k.a. "prime") lenses will always be better than the best zooms. Although I haven't abandoned that prejudice, this lens, and the Pentax 16-45mm lens, have certainly made me reconsider it. The question that matters, though, is whether the convenience of the zoom outweighs the marginal superiority of prime lenses.
Putting that question aside, this lens is absolutely phenomenal for the price, and is a first-rate lens regardless of price. I think Pentax users have to read a lot of users' reviews to figure out which lenses are the outstanding performers. On that basis, I bought the 16-45 and this 55-300mm. To make them affordable and reasonably lightweight, the manufacturer has made them relatively slow. Speed is where the prime lens wins. Thus, my complete stable comprises these two zooms, a 50mm f/1.4 (superb!) and my old 85mm f/1.8 -- all Pentax.
In conclusion: This lens is a winner. It appears to be better built than the 16-45, very solid with excellent movement of the zooming ring. At first, I thought 300mm was crazy. I never used a lens anywhere near 450mm in the days of 35mm, and I don't carry a tripod as a rule. But now that I have the lens, I find that in conjunction with the K20D's excellent anti-shake control, 300mm hand-held at 1/90th and faster is quite useful. Buy it! |
Small, sharp, and LOOOOOONG!
|
| Review Date: May 30, 2009 |
| Reviewer: T. Heagney, |
This is a terrific lens for the K20D or any other Pentax. OK, it's not as fast as the DA*50-135, or the Sigma 70-200...But this one is half the weight of either and a lot smaller than most compact 70-300s...makes the Tamron 70-300 look like a tank. And f4 isn't that slow! Stays at f4 till almost 135mm, and then only gets past f4.5 around 215! If you are doing your quick DSLR calculations, you see that this means and f4 85mm, an f4 135mm an f4 180mm...and a 300mm f4.5! Most times this lens gets you within one stop of the heavy expensive glass--and this one goes with you instead of staying at home or in the bag.
Add to this that it is sharp and contrasty, and shows just about zero CA. The evil purple fringe is banished, too. Check out Pop Photo's review!
It's hard to get this lens off the camera, because getting down to 55mm makes it work in tighter quarters than the 70-300 types.
Another great feature is the ease of using manual focus while in auto focus mode. No fuss, just focus! This offsets some hunting at the f5.8 racked-out point; just get it into rough focus and then the auto focus works like a charm (bit loud, though).
Oh, and even with the hood on, it won't block the pop-up flash even at 300! I TOLD you it is compact! |
Pentax 55-300mm zoom with Pentax K10D camera
|
| Review Date: September 1, 2008 |
| Reviewer: Richard Albeck, West Linn, Or, USA |
| I was worried about this lens because of the confusing reviews on several "pro" websites. I shoot weddings and needed a fairly fast lens for candid distance shots and headshots. I am extremely pleased with the lens upon shooting my first wedding with it in an evening setting.One picture from 60 ft of a guest reclining in the shade was very impressive. It was so sharp that the hairs on the back of his hand were clearly visable in Photoshop when zooming at 200X. I can't afford an F2.8 lens yet but this f4 lens with the internal Image Stabilization of the K10D definitely will do for now. It is lightweight and has no problems focusing sharply. The minimum 55mm range was perfect for shooting across tables in reception hall shots. |
Great value
|
| Review Date: July 9, 2008 |
| Reviewer: Stormcoder, Seattle, Wa United States |
| I got this lens to replace the Tamron 70-300mm. I would skip the Tamron and just get this one. Just the quick switch focus is worth the money. If your in low light and the auto focus is hunting you can just grab the manual focus and go. The camera is choosing the wrong point for the focus, just grab the manual. No switching to auto focus required. It's also weather sealed and the image quality is great. It also has the focal length range to make this a decent walking around lens. I took some great fireworks images this independence day with this lens. I set the aperture to f11 and then took three to ten second exposures, with tripod of course. Worked great. |
Excellent pro-sumer telephoto solution for Pentax SLR's
|
| Review Date: March 18, 2009 |
| Reviewer: R. Jones, Houston USA |
| If you were ever frustrated by the need to reach out further with your photo imaging equipment but can't afford the mega-bucks required to own one of the big high level prime telephoto lens, this little guy may be your solution. It's 55-300mm reach is not only very respectable and useful, but the quality of the image that you get over the range of it's zoom at all stops is also surprisingly high!. I own the Tamron 70-300 Macro as well, but was never really satsified with the lack of sharpness and contrast - even though I did like its separate macro mode. But the Pentax 55-300 is way ahead in terms of sharpness and contrast and its focusing speed is quite satsifactory. I now feel I have a pro-sumer level product that is well-worth the few extra bucks over the similar products offered by 3rd party lens producers for Pentax. Buy this one in confidence that you'll get everything you pay for plus some very pleasant surprises in the quality of your photos. With it's relatively close focusing distance and it's zoom, you'll be doing "faux" macro shots without ever haveing to switch to the Macro "mode". I know it's not pro-level, but I'm giving it a 5-star for it's undeniable value for the $$. |
Great lens.. great value
|
| Review Date: February 16, 2009 |
| Reviewer: Larry K. Reddig, Newark, Ohio United States |
| I take a lot of wildlife photos and need the reach. I bought this lens to replace a Pentax 55 - 200 mm I was using on my Pentax K10D. The extra reach is great and the lens is noticably sharper. The auto focusing is spot on and fast. The lens is heavier than the one I replaced, but it gives the camera/lens combo a quality feel. Great value from Amazon. I see these much higher elsewhere. |
Great lens
|
| Review Date: February 19, 2009 |
| Reviewer: R Gibbons, Silicon Valley, California |
Plus: Well built & sturdy, Reasonable size and weight to carry all day long, The 55-300mm is big range, good for taking near and distant objects, F/4-5.8 is bright enough, Auto and Manual focus works well, Price seems like a bargin for such a nice lens. I also own the smaller 50-200mm, and this lens seems twice as good.
Minus: Makes a louder noise when auto focusing, compared to kit lens (but it is bigger, heavier, and has more distance to cover); I don't think this will be an issue unless trying to sneak up on wildlife (then do manual focus for course adjust, and finish with auto focus for fine adjust that is fairly quiet for small changes). |
Affordable Quality
|
| Review Date: May 7, 2009 |
| Reviewer: K. Lee, NYC, NY USA |
| I originally purchased the DA 50-200mm lens as a compact companion to the kit 18-55mm AL II, but since I wanted something with a little more reach, I decided to add the DA 55-300mm to my collection and am glad I did! This lens produces superior images throughout its focal range, even wide open at 300mm, hand held. It is definitely a better match for the resolving power of the K20D sensor than the 50-200mm, and although the lens is a little bulky, especially when zoomed out fully, it's surprisingly lighter than it looks. This lens, together with the 18-55 AL II, covers an impressive focal range, and takes great pictures, at an affordable price. |
Very nice tele zoom!
|
| Review Date: August 5, 2008 |
| Reviewer: Alex Vox, Winnetka, IL |
| I like this lens a lot. It is very versatile in framing, has very smooth rings, very nice image rendition and reasonably sharp. I used it with both k10d and k20d and was very pleased with the results. For the money it is a great value. Must say that anti shake in Pentax bodies much facilitates the shooting on the longer side and the lens itself is well build (just like any of Pentax lenses that I tried), has nice balance on a camera and does not feel cumbersome or clumsy. In one word it is good bargain lens. |
|
This entry was posted on Saturday, September 12th, 2009 at 2:00 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
|
Entries (RSS)
Finding the right site…
I guess I am growing tired of the same old type of sites that have boring cams. They seem to have the same old ugly girl doing nothing and just taking money from everyone. I know a lot of people that have sites put up these affiliates and I do myself …
Хорошего Вам дня! JUSTIN says:
PillSpot.org. Canadian Health&Care.No prescription online pharmacy.Special Internet Prices.Pillspot.org.